State v. . Cain
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The only question raised by the appeal is whether a sentence of not less than twenty-five nor more than thirty years for violation of C. S., 4236, is “cruel and unusual punishment” within the meaning of Art. I, sec. 14, of the Constitution of North Carolina.
The decision of this Court in S. v. Swindell, 189 N. C., 151, is determinative of this appeal.
Yiolation of C. S., 4236, is denounced as a felony, and the punishment prescribed is “imprisonment in the State’s Prison ... in the discretion of the court.”
In the full and well considered opinion by Mr. Justice Clarlcson in S. v. Swindell, supra,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. . SwindellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. Rippy.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. GriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.