Legal Opinion

Crispell v. Rust

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorschauser, J.

Doctor Crispell, a resident of the city of Poughkeepsie, N. Y., and the father of an infant son, Harold Crispell, who had attained the age of four years on August 1, 1933, and is under his care and control, applies for a mandamus order directed to the board of education, city of Poughkeepsie, and the superintendent of schools, commanding them to allow the said infant son to attend the kindergarten class in School No. 8, a public school of the city of Poughkeepsie, or any other kindergarten school under their jurisdiction in said city.

The respondents appeared on the return day of the motion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bullock v. . CooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. O'Connor v. EmersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Matter of Levitch v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. People Ex Rel. Empire City Trotting Club v. State Racing CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Board of Examiners of the Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Golden v. HamiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Howard v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. George v. FioreNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API