Scoggins v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
Brandi Scoggins appeals the trial court’s denial of her petition for fees and costs following a verdict in her favor under the MagnusonMoss Warranty Act (the “Act”). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
The record shows that in Scoggins’s underlying action against Kia Motors America, Inc. (“Kia”) for breach of written and implied warranties under the Act, 15 USC § 2301 et seq., a Cobb County jury returned a verdict in favor of Scoggins and awarded her $16,000 in damages. Subsequently, Scoggins filed a petition for fees and costs under 15 USC § 2310 (d) (2),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santora v. American Combustion, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Southern Co. v. HamburgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- McDonald v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Empire Shoe Co. v. Nico Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Sharpe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- James A. Rafac v. Jiangsu Linhai Power MacHinery Group CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024