Legal Opinion

Clark v. Palmer

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1891No. 14299PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

This action was brought in the county of San Diego by Clark against Eliza M. Palmer, Douglas Gunn, and C. E. Johnson to foreclose a mortgage executed by Eliza M. Palmer to secure the payment of her promissory note to the plaintiff for the sum of five thousand dollars and interest. The ground upon which Gunn and Johnson were made parties defendant is expressed in the complaint, as follows: “That Douglas Gunn and Charles Edward Johnson have, or claim to have, some interest in or claim upon said premises as mortgagees or otherwise, which claims or interest were acquired by them…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bewick v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harpold v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Higley v. PollockNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cory v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. López v. MeléndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API