Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Overstreet

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1933No. 1441—6096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDY, Judge.

We sustain plaintiff in error’s assignment complaining of the action of the trial court in overruling the general demurrer urged by it to defendant in error’s cross-action.

The cross-action against which the demurrer was leveled was one in the county' court to recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. It described an injury for which such law fixes compensation at a sum in excess of $6,000. Defendant in error sought to limit the recovery on the cause of action alleged by his prayer in which he asked that judgment be awarded him in the sum of $980.

Under the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. Canyon Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Cotulla v. Thomas Goggan & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gimbel & Son v. J. Gomprecht & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Burke & Aitcheson v. Adoue & LobitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucey v. SE TEX. EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN ASSOC., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  2. Alfred v. Earl Hayes Rents Cars & TrucksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Steadman v. BillingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Supreme Camp of the American Woodmen v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Lucey v. Southeast Texas Emergency Physicians AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API