Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Perl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 1987No. C6-87-981PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (hereinafter St. Paul), the plaintiff below, filed a motion for summary judgment in its suit for subrogation of insurance claims paid on behalf of Perl’s law firm. Perl filed a cross-motion for partial summary *664judgment, alleging that one of the firm’s by-laws, which purportedly requires his indemnification, extinguished any subrogation rights possessed by St. Paul. The trial court granted St. Paul’s motion and denied Perl’s, but found the issue doubtful and important and had it certified for review by this court.

Although the trial court has…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Thornton Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  2. Rowe v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Zurich Reinsurance (UK) Ltd. v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Residential Funding Co. v. HSBC Mortgage Corp. (USA) (In re Residential Capital, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. United States Fire Insurance v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API