Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Spaeth

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1927No. 1274PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

A petition for rehearing has been filed. Former opinion, 254 Pac. 123.

Complaint is made that authorities cited in respondent’s brief on the former hearing were not commented upon in our opinion. We did not comment on those authorities because we thought none of them in point on any question that arose under the facts in the case. And the brief in support of the petition for rehearing does not make specific mention of any overlooked authority that is considered by counsel to be contrary to any principle announced in our opinion. Some authorities that seemed to us to support…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Leonard Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. SteenMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Wagner v. SpaethWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  4. McMullen v. People's Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. SchmittSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API