Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Shaw

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1988No. Appeals Nos. 1895 C.D. 1988 and 2090 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

This consolidated appeal has its genesis in an equity action filed by John Shaw (Appellee herein) in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

The relevant facts are as follows. Shaw is a member of Philadelphia Lodge No. 5, Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), as well as the FOPs board of directors. Shaw was also a candidate for president of the FOP.1 On February 17, 1988, Shaw sent a letter to Robert S. Hurst, president of the FOP and an Appellant herein, requesting permission to examine all corporate documents as set forth in the Non-profit Corporation Law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. T. W. Phillips Gas & Oil Co. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Sto-Rox Focus on Renewal Neighborhood Corp. v. KingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Department of Environmental Resources v. OermannCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Shaw v. HurstCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Lewis v. Pennsylvania Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Lewis v. Pennsylvania Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API