Szymanski v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUCKER, Judge.
Following a battery conviction, Leonard Szymanski was fired from his job with the Roseland Police Department. He sought unemployment compensation which an Administrative Law Judge denied on the basis that Szymanski had been fired for gross misconduct. After this court reversed the battery conviction, Szymanski sought an appeal before the Review Board challenging the initial denial of unemployment benefits. The Review Board dismissed the appeal as untimely. Seymanski now appeals contending the Board erred in so doing. We disagree and therefore affirm.
Szymanski began…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. NealIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- INB Banking Co. v. Opportunity Options, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Steel Transportation Co. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Greenberger, Krauss & Tenenbaum v. CatalfoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Charles A. Beard Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Board of School TrusteesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- T.R. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Cunningham v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Szymanski v. REVIEW BD. DEPT. OF WORKFORCE DEV. & ROSELAND POLICE DEPT.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Amico v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010