State v. Leduc
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
In accordance with our remand in State v. Leduc, 40 Conn. App. 233, 670 A.2d 1309 (1996), the trial court conducted an in camera inspection of the department of children and families file and found that the file does not contain (1) exculpatory evidence, (2) information material and favorable to the defense, (3) favorable evidence that might have led the jury to entertain a reasonable doubt about guilt, (4) information that probably would have changed the outcome of the trial, or (5) any evidence that is material and favorable to the defendant’s case.
Our in camera review of the department…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. LeducConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. William C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. OlahConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. Richard W.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.