Legal Opinion
Postler & Jaeckle Corp. v. County of Monroe Industrial Development Agency
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Andrew V. Siracuse, J.
In this action plaintiff Postler & Jaeckle Corp., a construction firm, seeks payment for labor, services, and materials that it supplied on behalf of Photech Acquisition Corporation *393(Photech)1 for a project financed through the defendant County of Monroe Industrial Development Agency (COMIDA). Plaintiff’s complaint sets forth five causes of action based on: (1) agency; (2) account stated; (3) refusal to accept specifically ordered material; (4) negligence; and (5) unjust enrichment. The matter is before the court for decision on plaintiff’s motion for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Bauer v. AmbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. v. Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hotel Syracuse Inc. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (In Re Hotel Syracuse Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v. Wyoming County Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Postler & Jaeckle Corp. v. County of Monroe Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992