Legal Opinion
Malvo v. Mathena
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 26, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-375, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-376PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Raymond A. Jackson, United States , District Judge
Lee Boyd Malvo (“Petitioner”) has submitted two motions pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, -Section 2254 for writs of habeas corpus by a person in state custody (“§ 2254 motions”). Chief Warden Randall Mathena (“Respondent”) filed a motion to dismiss Petitioner’s § 2254 motions. Having thoroughly reviewed the Parties’ filings in this case, the Court finds this matter is ripe for judicial determination. For the reasons set forth below, Respondent’s motion to dismiss is DENIED and Petitioner’s § 2254 motions…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lee Malvo v. Randall MathenaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Dumas v. ClarkeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Johnson v. WoodsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Mejia-Velez v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.