Legal Opinion

Roy v. United States

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided November 13, 2018No. 18-cv-3105 (JGK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN G. KOELTL, United States District Judge:

On October 19, 2017, the petitioner, Anik Roy, pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to Counts I and II of an indictment. Count I charged the petitioner with conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C. § 641 ; Count II charged the petitioner with the substantive offense of theft of Government funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 641 and 2. By pleading guilty pursuant to the plea agreement, the petitioner avoided pleading guilty to Count III of the indictment, which charged him with aggravated identity theft, in violation of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carolina Fernandez v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
  2. Mateus v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. Veras v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API