Legal Opinion
Lawyer Disciplinary Bd. v. Sidiropolis
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 2019No. 17-1134PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice:
*842This lawyer disciplinary proceeding against George N. Sidiropolis ("Mr. Sidiropolis") was brought to this Court by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") on behalf of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board ("LDB"). The sanctions recommended by the Hearing Panel Subcommittee ("HPS") of the LDB include, among other things: a two-year suspension; a stay of the two-year suspension after sixty days have been served for imposition of a twenty-two month period of supervised probation (with the supervised probation being subject to various conditions and requirements); automatic…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Office of Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In the Matter of the Honorable Louise E. Goldston, Judge of the Thirteenth Family Court CircuitWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Gregory H. Schillace, a Member of the West Virginia State BarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2022
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. MarcumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Patrick DohenyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2024
- State of West Virginia v. Dean E. Gamble, Sr.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2020