Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Regional Transportation District
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 2001No. 00CA1778PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 asserting violations of the First Amendment, plaintiffs, Gloria Holliday and Jack McCros-key, appeal the judgment dismissing their claims against defendants, Robert L. Tons-ing, Brenda Bergman, and the Regional Transportation District (RTD). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Except as indicated, the following facts are either undisputed or are taken from plaintiffs' uncontroverted affidavits.
RTD is a political subdivision of the state that is authorized to develop, maintain, and operate a mass transportation system.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. AleemSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- People v. StanleyColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Curious Theater Co. v. Colorado Department of Public Health & EnvironmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- v. AuneColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Independence Institute v. CoffmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.