Legal Opinion
Maguire v. Sandy Mac, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 15, 1991No. Civ. No. 90-2043(SSB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for class certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated hereinafter, plaintiff’s motion is denied in part and granted in part.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
On May 24, 1990, Quaker Valley Meats, Inc. (“Quaker Valley”) filed a class action complaint in this court. Quaker Valley named as defendants Sandy Mac, Inc. (“Sandy Mac”), a meat wholesaler, and various Sandy Mac corporate officers. Quaker Valley’s complaint asserted causes of action against defendants under the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Serbin v. Ziebart International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Elliott v. ITT Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- In re Tri-State Crematory LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
- In re Ford Motor Co. Bronco II Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.