Legal Opinion

Inman v. Brookman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1911Published

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County. Hon.-R. B. Tripp, Judge. Action by D. M.' Inman against E. D. Brookman and others. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, certain defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants E. T). and S. E. Brookman and John R. Barrett from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff and from the order denying a new trial. Tt is alleged in the complaint, in substance, that the above-named defendants, with Robert L. AVight, on the 23d day of September, 1903, and for a number of )rear-s prior and subsequent thereto, were copartners doing business at Vermilion and at I)e Smet, in the state of South Dakota, under the firm name and style of the *362Vermilion-De Smet Milling Company. It is further alleged that on the said 23d day of September, 1903,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. 1st National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Tillier v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1788

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API