Mottram v. Heyer
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
Error to the supreme court. The facts of the case, with the points argued by the counsel for the respective parties, and the reasons of the supreme court, will be found in 1 Denio, 483. The cause was argued here, by
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
Two questions are presented for our consideration, to both of which the attention of the judge who tried the cause, and the attention of the counsel, was distinctly called at the time of the trial. First; whether the right to stop in transitu still existed at the time the agent of the plaintiffs applied to Heyer, the importer, and requested him to give up *630the goods to them, on account of his failure 1 Second ; whether such a demand from the vendee was a proper exercise of the right to stop in transitu; and to enable the plaintiffs to maintain this action against the vendee, for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Buckley v. Furniss & StickneyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
3Cited by15 opinions
- Poole v. H. & T. C. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1882
- Cartwright v. . WilmerdingNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Rucker v. FeiferlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- More, Reynolds & Co. v. LottNevada Supreme Court · 1878
- Mason v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.