Legal Opinion

Rogers v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2008No. S-07-0115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[T1] Jeremiah Rogers was charged by the State of Wyoming with third degree sex-

ual assault. His wife, LR, is the alleged victim of that assault. 1 Prior to trial, the State expressed its intent to call LR as a witness to testify against her husband. Mr. Rogers contended that LR was entitled to assert a marital privilege and could not be compelled to testify. The district court certified this question:

Can an alleged victim spouse be compelled by the State of Wyoming to testify against his or her spouse or does the witness-spouse alone have a privilege to refuse to testify…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Wyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Seyle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starrett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Morris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Morris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API