Legal Opinion

Dunn v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1957No. Docket 52, Calendar 47,057PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

(after stating the facts). This case focuses attention on that which is known to most writers upon the common law, and certainly to all law students, as the “jackass doctrine.” The nickname, “with whatever implications it may carry” (Prosser On Torts [2d ed], §52, p 291), finds its origin in the English case of Davies v. Mann (1842), * 10 M & W 546 (152 Eng Rep 588, 19 Eng Rnl Cas 190); 38 Am Jur, Negligence, § 216, p 902; 65 CJS, Negligence, § 136, pp 758, 759. The doctrine came to initial prominence in this country by means of another rail-crossing suit — the collision, as here, occurred in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Schneider v. PomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. St. John v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ackerman Ex Rel. Ackerman v. JamesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Armstrong v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. DeCorte v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Shafkind v. KrollMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API