Legal Opinion
General Clutch Corp. v. Lowry
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 30, 1998No. 3:93CV1893 (JBA), 3:94CV2200 (JBA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [docs. 150-1, 150-2]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
/. INTRODUCTION
Defendants, David A. Lowry (“Mr. Low-ry”) and CEMA Technologies, Inc. (“CEMA”) move for Judgment as a Matter of Law under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) following a bifurcated trial and jury verdict against both Lowry and CEMA for violation of the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Conn. Gen.Stat., § 35-51 et seq. (“CUTSA”) and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 42-110a et seq. (“CUTPA”). Defendant Lowry was also found liable for violations of his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cruz v. Local Union No. 3 of International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mary Ann Luciano v. The Olsten Corporation Frank N. Liguori Gordon J. Bingham Martin GelermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- District Lodge 26 v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010