Cyrus v. Nero
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiffs-appellants, Dianna S. Cyrus and her husband, Orville Cyrus, appeal an adverse summary judgment on their action for medical malpractice against defendants-appellees, Richard P. Nero and Ohio Valley Medical Group, d/b/a Madison Clinic.
We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Richard P. Nero (Nero) is a physician employed by the Madison Clinic. On April 22, 1983, Nero was to perform certain surgical procedures upon Dianna Cyrus (Cyrus), including a sterilization procedure medically known as a bilateral tubal ligation. On May 26, 1983, Cyrus consulted with Nero…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Howard v. H.J. Ricks Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Burks v. RushmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Spoljaric v. PanganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Walters v. RinkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Frady v. HedgcockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Wilson v. Wal-Mart StoresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- LeBrun v. ConnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Garneau v. BushIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- C & E CORP. v. Ramco Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.