Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Hepworth

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1992No. 91-1479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

We review an order denying relief under rule 1.540(b). The motion that led to the order sought to have the court vacate an earlier final order and re-enter it so as to allow for a timely notice of appeal of that final order. The motion was grounded on the fact that when the final order was received from the court in the mail, a member of the attorney’s clerical staff misfiled the document, thus preventing the office’s established system of docketing and follow up from being timely and properly employed. If it had been, the attorney swore, the notice of appeal would have been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. PearsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Fiber Crete Homes, Inc. v. DIVISON OF ADM., DEPT. OF TR.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Markevitch v. Van HarrenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Intercontinental Properties, Inc. v. U.S. Security Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paul v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API