Legal Opinion

Marden v. Dorthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1896No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by Hannah Jane Harden against Ella M. Dorthy, John F. Dorthy, Hiram L. Barker, and the Monroe County Savings Bank to set aside a deed and certain mortgages. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

This action was brought to set aside a deed of premises, purporting to have been executed by the plaintiff to the defendant Ella M. Dorthy, and mortgages on the same premises afterwards executed by the defendants Dorthy to the defendants the Monroe County Savings Bank and Hiram L. Barker, respectively. The principal facts found by the court are substantially as follows: That on the 12th day of December, 1892, the defendant John F. Dorthy caused to be recorded an instrument in writing, under seal, purporting to be a deed executed and acknowledged by the plaintiff on the 31st day of October,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Albany County Savings Bank v. McCartyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Phelan v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Page v. . KrekeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. People ex rel. Munson v. BartelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fatta v. EdgertonNew York Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API