Legal Opinion · Dissent

Isaacs v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 27, 1966No. 41276, 41527Published

1DissentLavender, Justice

The plaintiff in error, Roy Isaacs, herein.after called the plaintiff, for himself and ■others similarly situated, commenced an action in the District Court of Oklahoma County against the City of Oklahoma City, ■a municipal corporation, that city’s Urban Renewal Authority, and the members of the Board of Commissioners of such Urban Renewal Authority, and its Executive Director, as defendants, praying for a declaratory judgment that the Urban Redevelopment Law that applies to cities having a population in excess of 100,000 (11 O.S.1961 Secs. 1601 through 1620) is unconstitutional upon various…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zachary v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Application of City Council of City of TahlequahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Burch v. City of Pauls ValleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Town of Walters v. OrthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API