Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Cox

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The executrix having, on the application of an alleged creditor, been required to show cause why his claim should not be paid, appeared and averred that since the issuing of the letters testamentary she had married; and her husband not having been made a party to the proceeding, she insisted the application should be dismissed, with costs.

The statute prescribes that no married woman shall be entitled to letters testamentary, unless her husband consent thereto, by a writing to be filed with the Surrogate; and that, by giving such consent, he shall be deemed respon*154sible for her…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yates v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Whitney v. CoapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  3. In re the Inventory of the Goods of McCreadyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API