Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1969No. 41622PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

The offense is murder with malice; the punishment, 20 years.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not challenged and we do not deem a recital of the same essential to a proper disposition of this cause.

In his first ground of error appellant complains of improper voir dire examination of the prospective juror, Janet Wechs-ler. Apparently in the presence of the entire panel it' was established that Mrs. Wechsler had once been employed in the office of one of the defense counsel. Thereafter the assistant district attorney asked:

“Q. Were you working for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christopher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Christopher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API