Legal Opinion
People v. Anaya
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 2013No. Nos. F063835, F064116PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PEÑA, J.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants Adam Daniel Anaya and Eric Thomas Wolfe were tried together in the Superior Court of Tulare County on various criminal charges stemming from their forceful attempts to collect a criminal street gang debt. After their convictions, defendants were sentenced separately and appealed separately. Following consolidation of their appeals, defendants contend (1) the convictions must be reversed because (a) the jury was provided conflicting instructions on the manner to assess the key witness’s credibility, and (b) juror misconduct; (2) there is insufficient…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Pettie, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- (HC) Jones v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- People v. PettieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. PettieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.