Legal Opinion
United States v. Project on Gov't Oversight
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 23, 2008No. Civil Action 03-0096 (JDB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Following a discussion of the issue at the initial pretrial conference held on January 3, 2008, the government filed a motion in limine to preclude POGO and Berman from introducing any evidence of their “subjective intent” at trial. Familiarity with the facts set out in United States v. Project on Gov’t Oversight, 525 F.Supp.2d 161 (D.D.C.2007) (“POGO III”), is now assumed. On January 22, 2008, the Court issued an Order granting the government’s motion in order to allow the parties sufficient time to incorporate the decision on the motion into…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Sun Diamond GrowersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Franklyn C. NofzigerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Robert Lewis HedgesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States of America v. the Project on Government OversightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. Project on Government OversightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Project on Gov't OversightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. Project on Government OversightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010