Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shores v. Ross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1906No. 6415PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court September 17, 1906, for a writ of mandate to compel the commissioner of public lands to deliver a deed to tide lands, after confirmation of sale.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This is an application for an original mandamus on the part of the relators to require respondent to deliver to relators a deed to certain tide lands near the city of Tacoma. The relator E. A. Shores made an application for the purchase of these tide lands on the 9th day of January, 1906, making the necessary legal deposit. Said application stated that said lands were not occupied, and that there were no improvements thereon. Thereafter, a certificate of appraisal of the land was made out and filed and the land ordered sold. The usual notice of sale was given, as required by law, and the land…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pacific Bridge Co. v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Ottesen v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Powers v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Shores v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API