Legal Opinion

Nordic Trading Co. v. Imperial Forwarding Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 30, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCarlin, J.

The motion of the defendant Imperial Forwarding Co., Inc., for judgment on the pleadings, under rule 112 of the *28Buies of Civil Practice dismissing on the merits the complaint of the plaintiff, is granted.

When the complaint and the bill of particulars are read together, it becomes apparent that no binding contract for the sale of goods was made between this plaintiff and defendant. Such a contract, to be enforcible, would have to be wholly in writing, that is, all essential terms would have to be expressed in a written contract, or else embodied in a memorandum subscribed by the party sought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Poel v. . Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Fireproof Film Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Ohio & Michigan Coal Co. v. Clarkson Coal & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  4. Rodesch v. Kirkpatrick Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Feldman Co. v. Atwood Richards, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API