Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Garmany

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1927No. 17716PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Where property levied on has been released on a forthcoming bond and is not produced on the day of sale, the plaintiff in fi. fa. has two remedies. He can proceed directly against the sheriff by an action on the case or by rule; or he can bring suit upon the forthcoming bond, either in his own name or in the name of the sheriff for his use, provided that he has ratified the action of the sheriff in accepting the bond where it was taken without the consent of the plaintiff in fi. fa. These two remedies are inconsistent, and where the plaintiff in fi. fa. elects to sue on the forthcoming…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bacon & Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Hand v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garmany v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API