Legal Opinion

Goodover v. LINDEY'S INC.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1993No. 92-011PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

Lindey’s has filed an application for a writ of review together with a memorandum requesting this Court to dismiss an order finding Lindey’s in contempt. The order fined Lindey’s $500 and imprisoned its chief executive officer for five days. The imprisonment was suspended to give Lindey’s an opportunity to purge itself of contempt. Goodover has filed a response to the petition and Lindey’s has filed a reply to the response. We issue the writ and vacate the order of contempt.

The issues are:

1. Did the District Court have authority to find Lindey’s in contempt?

2. Did the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zosel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Goodover v. Lindey's, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Goodover v. Lindey's, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mr. Steak, Inc. v. Sandquist Steaks, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Sellman v. SellmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Michael LetaskyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lindey's, Inc. v. GoodoverMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lindey's, Inc. v. GoodoverMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Malee v. District Court for Second Judicial District Ex Rel. PurcellMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sanders v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API