Legal Opinion
Van Sickle v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 20, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
PARRILLO, J.A.D.
The issue in this appeal is whether an agent who provided services for the Motor Vehicles Commission (MVC)1 at a privatized motor vehicle agency is an employee or independent contractor for purposes of the Unemployment Compensation Law, N.J.S.A. 43:21-1 to 24.4 (UCL). Claimant, James Van Sickle, Jr., appeals from a final decision of the Board of Review (Board) denying his unemployment benefits claim because the services he provided for respondent MVC did not constitute “employment.” For reasons that follow, we affirm.
We view the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- O'Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of NorthlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Horn v. KeanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of LaborSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DANCE, INC. VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019