Great Northern Railway Co. v. Minnesota
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
This case is hére both by writ of error and appeal. Appeal being the proper method, the writ of error (No. 106) will be dismissed.
The action was brought by the state to recover taxes for the years 1901 to 1912, inclusive. Judgment against the company was rendered by the trial court for the years 1903 to 1912, no recovery being allowed for 1901 or 1902. Upon appeal the state supreme court affirmed the judgment. 160 Minn. 515. A writ of error from this Court was-dismissed for want of jurisdiction resulting from an insufficient setting forth and waiver of claim of a substantial federal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Express Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pullman Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3Cited by17 opinions
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Llinois Central Railroad v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Miller Bros. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.