Legal Opinion
Ferdnance v. Automobile Transport, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 29, 1978No. Civ. 77-71288PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RALPH M. FREEMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motions for summary judgment brought pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by defendants Automobile Transport, Inc., (ATI), International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Teamsters Local 299 (the Union). In their answer to defendants’ motions, plaintiffs have consented to the motion of defendant International Brotherhood of Teamsters, thus leaving only the motions of the other two defendants for decision by this Court. Since both motions involve substantially similar legal issues and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donald Sears v. Automobile Carriers, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Said v. Turner Brooks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980