Legal Opinion
Omernick v. Doyle
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 27, 1977No. 76-C-436PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, against the defendants Doyle and Seidl, a federal and state court judge, respectively, and the defendant LaRocque, a district attorney. The complaint alleges that all of the defendants are sworn to uphold the Constitution; that they “openly and flagrantly” violated the plaintiff’s fifth and fourteenth amendment rights and 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) by “remanding an action by telephone” on July 29, 1976; that they failed to notify him of the remand; and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butterman v. Walston & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anne M. Pavilonis v. Edward J. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Wolf v. CareyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977