Legal Opinion

In Re Hart

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas

Decided February 26, 1993No. 19-40807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ON POST-PETITION INHERITANCE

JOHN C. AKARD, Bankruptcy Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether Debtors’ post-petition inheritance is property of the Debtors’ estate subject to distribution to creditors under §§ 541(a)(5) and 1207(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. 1 The Debtors received the inheritance after they had complied with the confirmed Plan of Reorganization but before the case was closed. The court concludes that the post-petition inheritance is not subject to distribution to creditors. 2

FACTS 3

On October 30, 1987, Joe P. Hart and Sarah A. Hart (Debtors)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  2. In Re EuerleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987
  3. In Re FitakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  4. Robb v. Lybrook (In Re Lybrook)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  5. In Re ReiterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re EasleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
  2. Agribank, FBC v. Honey (In Re Honey)District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API