Meadows v. Hawkeye Ins.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Ringgold District Court This is an appeal by defendant from an order of the district court overruling a motion for judgment. The material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
Plaintiff brought this action on a policy of insurance. Defendant answered, admitting the execution of the contract but alleging that it contained a provision that the commencement of foreclosure or other proceedings upon any mortgage, lien or incumbrance of any kind, or of any suit or action in any court concerning the title in any wise, should immediately render the policy void; and that, subsequent to the execution of the policy, foreclosure proceedings were commenced on a mortgage covering the property insured. To this answer plaintiff filed a reply, in one paragraph of *58which he denied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Donaldson v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Stone v. C. & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Meadows v. Hawkeye InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Roberts v. Corbin & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1869
3Cited by11 opinions
- First National Bank v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Landis v. Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Hill v. City of GlenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Degelau v. WightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Plantz v. Kreutzer & WasemSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.