Legal Opinion

Estate of McAdow v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 7, 1949No. Docket Nos. 15789, 15799PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Black, Judge-.

Amounts received as compensation for personal service are includible in gross income under section 22 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code. On the other hand, the value of property received by gift is specifically excluded from gross income by the provisions of section 22 (b) (3). There is thus squarely presented the question of whether the securities transferred to McAdow in 1941 by Henry R. Benjamin and Mrs. McEvoy were in payment for services rendered and, therefore, includible in income, or constituted gifts and, as such, were excludable from income.

It should be noted at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bogardus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Schall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Travis T. Wallace, Hazel J. Wallace, C. O. Hambleton and Sallie B. Hambleton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Veterans of Foreign Wars, Dep't of Michigan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  3. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  4. Batman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  5. Abdella v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API