Legal Opinion

Feustel v. Rosenblum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 to remove the respondents Scott S. Rosenblum, Robert Lynn Cox III, Hugh A. O’Brien III, Bruce A. Rich, Pia Notaro Carroll, and Mario Posillico from public office in the Incorporated Village of Saltaire.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The petitioner failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the respondents engaged in any intentional wrongdoing, self-dealing transactions, or gross dereliction of duties. Thus, none of the respondents’ conduct rose to the level of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deats v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Pisciotta v. DendievelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Gumo v. CanzoneriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montanino v. RowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API