Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Voigt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1895No. Nos. 9603-(208)Published

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Lac Qui Parle county, dismissing an appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

The city of Ortonville is composed of territory lying within the counties of Big Stone and Lac Qui Parle, and was incorporated as a city by special act of the legislature, approved January 2S, 1881,2 and by its terms the act creates a city justice, with the general powers conferred upon justices of the peace.3

This action was commenced before said city justice by the plaintiff against the defendant, a resident of the county of Lac Qui Parle, and the summons served upon him in said county. He did not appear on the trial of the action, and judgment was entered against him in said court; and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Falk v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API