Legal Opinion

State v. Grainger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1976No. 7513SC994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant first contends that in denying his timely motion, made on 15 April 1975, for the appointment of a psychiatrist at State expense to interview him and testify in his behalf at trial, the Court denied his Sixth Amendment right to confront his accusers. He asserts that, being indigent, he was entitled to be put on the same footing as all other defendants in criminal actions, and, since he could not afford to pay the psychiatrist, the State was responsible to provide one for him.

Every criminal defendant has the constitutional right to confront his accusers with other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States Ex Rel. Smith v. BaldiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fulcher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Fulcher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API