W.B.Z. v. D.J.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThigpen, Judge
Although I concur with the majority that the cause must be reversed, it appears that the present case exposes an inconsistency in the application of Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986). In Terry, our Supreme Court established the rule that a natural parent has a prima facie right to custody of his/her child as against a non-parent. This presumption in favor of the natural parent can be overcome by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent is unfit or unsuited for custody and that the best interests of the child will be served by granting custody to the non-parent, or by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Roden v. ColburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- T.L.L. v. T.F.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.