Legal Opinion

Milby v. Templeton (In Re Milby)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 21, 2017No. 16-60022, 16-60023PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

The bankruptcy estate of Debtor Charlene Milby discovered allegedly fraudulent transfers days before the statute of limitations on avoidance claims was set to expire. This action was not filed until almost a year later. The bankruptcy court dismissed the action as time barred and held that the estate’s delay in filing after discovering the transfers precluded equitable tolling. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) reversed, holding that such post-discovery delay is irrelevant to whether equitable tolling applies.

Neither court correctly applied our law on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Benito Luna v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. George Gibbs v. Robert LegrandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Uwakwe v. Pelham Acad.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. (SS) Ward v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. Farwest Pump CompanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Merchant Transaction Systems Incorporated v. Nelcela Incorporated, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  5. Pitera v. Asset Recovery Group IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API