Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 18,555PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Nemaha district court; William I. Stuart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The question in this case is whether or not the plaintiff, who was negligent in driving upon a railway crossing in front of one of the defendant’s moving trains, should recover damages on the ground that the defendant was guilty of recklessness and wantonness in injuring him.

The collision occurred on Fourth street in the city of Centraba, a city of the third class. The street extends north and south. Three of the defendant’s tracks cross it from east to west near the center of the business section of the town. The street is the principal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Ziegelasch v. DurrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Trower v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Goodman ex rel. Goodman v. Kansas City, Merriam & Shawnee RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Buchhein v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API