Legal Opinion

In re Radl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petition for a Writ of Prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

It appears that P. M. Shaughnessey was appointed a justice of the peace by the common council of Portage, to fill a vacancy made by the resignation of another. Thereupon an action was commenced before such justice, and a summons issued by him in favor of one Charles Ghislow and against the petitioner herein, Charles Uadi. Upon the return of the summons served upon Radi, he applied to this court for a writ of prohibition to perpetually restrain such justice from taking any steps or exercising any jurisdiction in the cause, on the ground that the common council had no lawful authority tc> fill…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. In re of BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  3. State v. BloomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  4. In Re ManningSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Langlade CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. De Puy v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lodge v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. In re SimmonsNevada Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API