Hansen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Islip
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
We reject the petitioner’s contention that he is entitled to the area variances he seeks as of right because his property was held in single and separate ownership at the time of the enactment of the restrictions from which he seeks relief. Town of Islip Code §§ 68-111, 68-113 and 68-115 expressly provide that the owner of a plot which has been held in single and separate ownership at the time of the passage of the ordinance or any amendment thereto may qualify for only one variance as of right (i.e., either as to area density, total width, or side yard width), since each section requires…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Townwide Properties, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Siciliano v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kransteuber v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Licari v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Clute v. Town of Wilton Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Kreuter v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- D'Angelo v. HartmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.