Van Vranken v. Gartner
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Eelators applied for mandamus to compel respondent -fco vacate an order requiring them to furnish a hill of particulars. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 78 Mich. 217.
1Per curiam
This is an application for a mandamus to compel the circuit judge to vacate an order requiring the plaintiffs to furnish to defendant a hill of particulars of their demand.
The action is assumpsit, and the declaration is special, and sets up a contract between plaintiffs and the Union News Company of New York, by which, for $35 a month, defendant would distribute a paper published by plaintiffs, called “ The Daily Hotel Kegister,” on 11 specified trains running into Detroit daily, Sundays excepted; that the undertaking to publish the Register was a new one, and depended upon the advertising…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamilton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Van Vranken v. Union News Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rhinelander Refrigerator Co. v. RothenbergDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1928