Legal Opinion
Brown v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 3, 1941No. Civ. No. 6531PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.
Petitioner seeks to annul an order of respondent commission terminating the liability of respondent Fund [State Compensation Insurance Fund] for the payment of further compensation to him from and after March 13, 1940.
It is the rule that an order terminating liability for compensation payments should be affirmed if there is any evidence substantially tending to support the finding of the Industrial Accident Commission. (Newman v. Industrial Acc. Com., 137 Cal. App. 477 [30 Pac. (2d) 571].) The sole question here is whether or not the record measures up to the rule stated.
On January 30, 1939,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sanderson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Clapp's Parking Station v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Witt's Dairy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Newman v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Place v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Travelers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Guerra v. WCABCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. MixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.